The Offices of Audit and Evaluation supervise and conduct independent and objective audits, evaluations, and other reviews of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs and activities to ensure they operate economically, efficiently, and effectively. This page contains links to our audit and evaluation reports and memoranda.
Housing Authority of the City of Asbury Park, New Jersey
We completed an audit of the Housing Authority of the City of Asbury Park, Asbury Park, New Jersey. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether (1) capital funds were properly expended and obligated in accordance with HUD requirements, (2) salaries and related benefits allocated to different programs were reasonable and supported, and (3) controls over maintenance and repairs were adequate.
The Authority did not adequately…
May 23, 2007
Report
#2007-NY-1006
The State of Mississippi's Homeowner's Assistance Grant Program, Jackson, Mississippi, Did Not Appropriately Calculate Grants and Monitor the Program
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited the State of Mississippi's (State) calculation of homeowners' grant amounts and monitoring of the implementation of its Homeowner's Assistance Grant Program. Our audit was part of the activities in our annual audit plan. Our objectives were to determine whether the State appropriately calculated the homeowners' grant amounts and monitored…
May 06, 2007
Report
#2007-AO-1001
The Charleston Housing Authority, Charleston, South Carolina, Needs to Improve Controls Over Credit Card Use, Travel, and Petty Cash
May 01, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1009
Trumbull Metropolitan Housing Authority, Warren, Ohio, Did Not Ensure Its Nonprofit Followed HUD's Section 8 Housing Requirements
April 29, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1007
The Housing Authority of DeKalb County, Decatur, Georgia, Section 8 Units Generally Met Housing Quality Standards
April 29, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1008
The City of New Bedford, Massachusetts, Did Not Meet Certain Requirements of HUD's Community Development Block Grant Program
As part of our annual plan, we audited the Office of Housing and Community Development, City of New Bedford, Massachusetts' (City) administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs. Our audit objective was to determine whether the City complied with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations in administering its CDBG and HOME programs.
The City…
April 22, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1005
Elders Place II, Incorporated, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Did Not Properly Administer HUD Funds in Accordance with HUD Requirements
April 18, 2007
Report
#2007-PH-1006
Lower Manhattan Development Corporation Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance Funds
April 16, 2007
Report
#2007-NY-1005
The Municipality of Toa Baja, Puerto Rico, Needs to Improve Its Community Development Block Grant Program Administration
April 10, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1007
The Housing Authority of DeKalb County, Decatur, Georgia, Did Not Adequately Monitor Contract Payments
April 09, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1006
Rocky Mountain Mutual Housing Association, Denver, Colorado, Paid Ineligible Owner Expenses
April 09, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1005
City of Poughkeepsie Family Self-Sufficiency and Section 8 Programs
April 01, 2007
Report
#2007-NY-1004
The Jacksonville Housing Authority, Jacksonville, Arkansas, Mismanaged Public Housing Capital Fund Program Funding
March 29, 2007
Report
#2007-FW-1007
The Puerto Rico Department of Housing, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Did Not Effectively Administer Its Section 8 Housing Program
March 28, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1005
The Housing Authority of the City of Gary, Indiana, Lacked Adequate Controls over Refunding Savings
March 22, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1005