U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Export
Date Issued

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1005-001-I
    Closed on July 15, 2024

    Obtain training or technical assistance on CDBG program requirements.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-C
    $263,289
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Repay the project from non-project funds $263,289 for ineligible salary expenses.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-D
    $283,307
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Remove $283,307 in ineligible accrued salary fees payable from its financial statements and records and ensure that these expenses are not accrued or paid for with project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-E
    $110,710
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Repay the project from non-project funds $110,710 for ineligible offsite accounting expenses.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-F
    $129,416
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Remove $129,416 in ineligible accrued offsite accounting fees payable from its financial statements and records and ensure that these expenses are not accrued or paid for with project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-G
    $99,160
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Repay the project from non-project funds $99,160 for ineligible personal health insurance expenses of the owner.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-H
    $4,179
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Repay the project from non-project funds $4,179 for excessive bank fees.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-I
    $1,352
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Repay the project from non-project funds $1,352 for expenses related to the identity-of-interest hair salon.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-J
    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Obtain approval from HUD for a lease agreement with the hair salon.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-K
    $65,232
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Provide documentation to support that $65,232 in disbursements was used on reasonable and necessary operating expenses or repay the project from non-project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-L
    $620,937
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Pay the project $620,937 in uncollected rent from non-project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-M
    $162,462
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Pay the project from non-project funds $162,462 in lease agreement charges not deposited into Cypress Meadows’ bank account.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-N
    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Remove Skyline Crest Enterprises, LLC, as the operator and replace it with a HUD-approved independent operator.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-O
    Closed on February 01, 2018

    Develop and implement written policies and procedures for the management of the project, including but not limited to financial policies for cash disbursements, cash receipts, and documentation requirements.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0005-001-A
    $3,144,894
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on June 22, 2023

    Create and implement policies and procedures or change program regulations to prevent multifamily housing properties from charging more for Section 8 units than for comparable non-Section 8 units. For the 25 properties reviewed, this measure would prevent as much as $3,144,894 of Section 8 funds from subsidizing non-Section 8 units in the next year.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0004-001-A
    Closed on April 03, 2020

    Pursue departmental clearance for the July 25, 2013, guidance that did not go through required departmental clearance. For any items that cannot be appropriately cleared, HUD should take appropriate action to recall the document or policy.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0004-001-B
    Closed on March 18, 2020

    Develop guidance that helps the public understand its options for assistance between CDBG-DR and SBA and how to comply with Federal requirements.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1003-001-A
    Closed on January 31, 2018

    Develop and implement a written methodology for employees’ time allocations for its HUD grant programs in accordance with program requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1003-001-B
    Closed on February 06, 2018

    Provide training on compensation for personal services grant program requirements to employees working on HUD grants.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1003-001-C
    $142,181
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on January 31, 2018

    Support $142,181 spent on payroll allocated to HUD grants or repay the program from non-Federal funds.