Consider grant recipients’ feedback on challenges with (1) capacity, (2) multiple other sources of funding, and (3) subrecipient monitoring as part of CPD’s risk assessments.
2022-LA-0002 | August 17, 2022
Emergency Solutions Grants CARES Act Implementation Challenges
Community Planning and Development
- Status2022-LA-0002-001-AOpenClosed
2022-FO-0005 | June 27, 2022
HUD Compliance with the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019
Community Planning and Development
- Status2022-FO-0005-003-AOpenClosed
Collaborate with the Deputy Chief Financial Officer to work with grantees in identifying where improper and unknown payments could occur in the CPD-HIM program throughout the payment cycle, to include the risks associated with subgrantee billing, and document this analysis.
- Status2022-FO-0005-003-BOpenClosed
Collaborate with the Deputy Chief Financial Officer and use the analysis developed in 3A to ensure that HUD’s improper and unknown payment testing procedures are (1) designed to test the full payment cycle and (2) include the review of documentation that supports that final beneficiaries were eligible, goods and services were received, and payments went to the correct final beneficiaries and were for the correct amount.
- Status2022-FO-0005-003-COpenClosed
Work with the Office of Community Planning and Development’s Chief Risk Officer and grantees to better identify the risks of improper and unknown payments throughout the payment cycle, to include the risks associated with grantees and subgrantees, and consider these risks when performing the CDBG and Homeless Assistance Grant risk assessments.
- Status2022-FO-0005-003-DOpenClosed
Work with the Deputy Chief Financial Officer to develop and design a process to ensure that each attribute evaluated during the PIIA risk assessment is evaluated at all levels of the full payment cycle.
2022-AT-1001 | March 30, 2022
The State of Florida Administered Its Housing Repair and Replacement Program Effectively but Not Always in a Cost-Efficient and Prudent Manner for the Projects and Activity Delivery Costs Reviewed
Community Planning and Development
- Status2022-AT-1001-001-AOpenClosed$107,036Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Provide support for the reimbursement to its housing program of $107,036 from non-Federal funds if justification cannot be provided to support that the overhead and profit amounts paid to the contractors were reasonable.
- Status2022-AT-1001-001-BOpenClosed
Perform a review of the remaining 453 contracts and any additional contracts issued under the old invitations to bid to ensure that overhead and profit amounts charged by contractors were reasonable. The State should either provide justification or support for the reimbursements to its housing program from non-Federal funds for the unsupported amounts.
- Status2022-AT-1001-001-COpenClosed
Update policies and procedures to ensure that a cost reasonableness assessment is performed on all cost elements, including the overhead and profit percentages charged by contractors for future contracts.
- Status2022-AT-1001-001-DOpenClosed
Develop and implement procedures to ensure the execution of newly developed policies that require contractors that work on multiple programs to provide adequate support to distinguish the proper amount of time and cost spent on each program. The State should also be required to provide procedures that implement the policy changes.
- Status2022-AT-1001-001-EOpenClosed
Train staff to ensure that expenditures, including payments made to contractors, are classified to the proper project activity in the DRGR system and provide support for training conducted.
2022-LA-1001 | January 20, 2022
The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, Los Angeles, CA, Did Not Always Administer Its Continuum of Care Program in Accordance With HUD Requirements
Community Planning and Development
- Status2022-LA-1001-001-AOpenClosed$3,500,000Funds Put to Better Use
Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that subgrantee agreements are executed in a timely manner, effective monitoring is performed, and subgrantees maintain an emphasis on using their CoC funds, thereby preventing similar occurrences of $3.5 million (see appendix D) in CoC funding going unused.
- Status2022-LA-1001-001-BOpenClosed
Develop and implement strategies to address capacity and organizational problems or obtain technical assistance to address these issues.
- Status2022-LA-1001-001-COpenClosed
Develop and implement procedures and controls to clearly define and update point-of-contact staff for subgrantees.
- Status2022-LA-1001-001-DOpenClosed
Work with HUD and subgrantees to reevaluate its CoC program’s performance goals and set targets that help to ensure that funds for future CoC grants are fully and effectively used to advance the goal of ending homelessness.
- Status2022-LA-1001-002-AOpenClosed$824,302Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Adequately support the eligibility of payroll costs or repay its CoC grants $824,302 from non-Federal funds.
- Status2022-LA-1001-002-BOpenClosed$55,545Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Adequately support the eligibility of rent costs or repay its CoC grants $55,545 from non-Federal funds.
- Status2022-LA-1001-002-COpenClosed
Develop and implement additional written procedures and controls to ensure that employees charge time in accordance with program requirements and that the Authority fully documents and supports that salary and rental cost allocations are charged to its CoC grants in accordance with its cost allocation plan.
- Status2022-LA-1001-003-AOpenClosed
Complete and implement policies and procedures to ensure that APRs are submitted by the closeout deadline.
- Status2022-LA-1001-003-BOpenClosed
Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that relevant personnel are routinely and regularly trained on the grant closeout process.
2022-AT-0001 | January 05, 2022
Opportunities Exist To Improve CPD’s Oversight of and Monitoring Tools for Slow-Spending Grantees
Community Planning and Development
- Status2022-AT-0001-001-AOpenClosed
Revise its methodology to identify slow spenders, including appropriate baselines and the definition of slow spenders.