U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

HUD OIG assisted the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida, in the civil investigation of Group One Mortgage, Inc.  Group One’s principal place of business is located in Jupiter, FL.  Group One has participated in the FHA insurance program since 2004 and became a direct endorsement lender in 2005.  The direct endorsement program authorizes private-sector mortgage lenders to approve mortgage loans for FHA insurance.  Lenders approved for the program must follow FHA requirements and provide annual and per loan certifications that the lender complied with these requirements when underwriting and approving loans for FHA insurance.  When a borrower defaults on an FHA-insured loan, HUD pays the insurance claims submitted by or on behalf of the lender. 

Based on our review of FHA loans underwritten by Group One, the United States contended that it had certain civil claims against the lender arising from false claims that Group One had made to FHA as a direct endorsement lender.  The United States alleged that Group One approved four loans for FHA insurance but did not underwrite the loans in accordance with HUD-FHA regulations.  It further alleged that Group One did not use due diligence to comply with HUD handbook requirements and ensure that the loans it approved on behalf of HUD were eligible for FHA insurance.  Group One denied the allegations.  On November 19, 2014, Group One entered into a settlement agreement to pay $406,000 to settle allegations that it had submitted false claims to FHA in violation of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. (United States Code) 3729-3733, and common law causes of action.  Of the settlement total, the FHA insurance fund was to receive $376,523, and the remaining $29,477 was to be paid to other Federal entities.  The parties to the settlement agreement entered into the agreement to avoid the delay, uncertainty, inconvenience, and expense of lengthy litigation of the alleged claims.  The parties also agreed that the settlement was neither an admission of liability by Group One nor a concession by the United States that its claims were not well founded.