HUD Did Not Provide Adequate Oversight and Guidance During the Technical Review of the Retreat at Santa Rita Springs
We conducted the audit of the Retreat at Santa Rita Springs (community), a Federal Housing Administration-insured multifamily property under the Section 231 of the National Housing Act, in response to a congressional request from Representative Gabrielle Giffords of the 8th Congressional District of Arizona. In November 2009, the owners of the community defaulted on its $29.9 million U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-…
August 01, 2010
Report
#2011-LA-0001
Alacrity Lending Company, Southlake, TX, Did Not Properly Underwrite a Selection of FHA Loans
We reviewed 20 Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans that Alacrity Lending Company (Alacrity) underwrote as an FHA direct endorsement lender. Our review objective was to determine whether Alacrity underwrote the 20 loans in accordance with FHA requirements. This review is part of Operation Watchdog, an Office of Inspector General (OIG) initiative to review the underwriting of 15 direct endorsement lenders at the suggestion of the FHA…
July 25, 2010
Memorandum
#2010-LA-1803
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs Did Not Fully Follow Requirements or Best Practices in the Acquisition of Its Disaster Recovery-Funded Program Management Firm
We audited the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Supplemental II Disaster Recovery program, funds, administered by the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA). Specifically, we wanted to determine whether TDHCA followed Federal and State of Texas (State) regulations in procuring the program management firm to administer the Housing Assistance and Sabine Pass…
July 19, 2010
Report
#2010-FW-1005
HUD Evaluated and Selected Applications for the Recovery Act’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 in Accordance With Applicable Requirements
We evaluated the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) award process for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 (NSP2). We initiated the review as part of the activities in our fiscal year 2010 annual audit plan. Our primary objective was to determine whether HUD’s methodology and controls for the evaluation and selection of applications for the $1.93 billion in NSP2 funds were in accordance with applicable requirements. We…
June 24, 2010
Report
#2010-AT-0001
The Georgetown Housing Authority Used $195,855 for Ineligible and Unsupported Expenditures
We audited the Georgetown Housing Authority (Authority) due to a congressional request. Our objectives were to determine (1) whether the Authority and/or its nonprofit affiliates used U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funding for recent developments and if so, whether they followed HUD regulations and (2) whether the Authority used HUD funds only for eligible expenditures.
The Authority’s nonprofit related entities did…
June 01, 2010
Report
#2010-FW-1004
Sasha Bruce Youthwork, Incorporated, Washington, DC, Did Not Support More Than $1.9 Million in Expenditures
We audited Sasha Bruce Youthwork, Incorporated (Youthwork, Inc.) to determine whether it used its Youthbuild and Supportive Housing program grant funds in accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations and its grant agreements. We found that Youthwork, Inc., did not support the eligibility of more than $1.9 million in expenditures. Youthwork, Inc., failed to maintain records identifying the source and…
May 10, 2010
Report
#2010-PH-1008
HUD Took Appropriate Steps to Improve Its Controls over Net Restricted Assets but Overpaid Section 8 Set-Aside Funds to One Public Housing Agency
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited HUD's Office of Public Housing and Voucher Programs to determine whether HUD reasonably ensured that public housing agencies properly managed their housing choice voucher net restricted assets and to determine whether HUD appropriately awarded 2009 set-aside fund awards for unforeseen circumstances and higher than average leasing. We found that HUD…
April 15, 2010
Report
#2010-KC-0001
HUD’s Recapture and Reallocation Plan for Recovery Act Public Housing Capital Fund Grants Had Weaknesses
We audited the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) compliance with obligation, recapture, and reallocation requirements for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) Public Housing Capital Fund program. Specifically, its plans to recapture unobligated Recovery Act Public Housing Capital Fund formula grants by the March 17, 2010 obligation deadline and to reallocate the recaptured funds. HUD’s plan…
April 12, 2010
Report
#2010-FW-0002
The Office of Affordable Housing Programs' Oversight of Resale and Recapture Provisions for HOME Investment Partnerships Program-Assisted Homeownership Projects Was Inadequate
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited HUD’s Office of Affordable Housing Programs’ (Office) oversight of resale and recapture provisions for HOME Investment Partnerships Program (Program)-assisted homeownership projects (project). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2009 annual audit plan to contribute to improving HUD’s execution of and accountability for its fiscal…
April 12, 2010
Report
#2010-CH-0002
The Office of Block Grant Assistance Lacked Adequate Controls Over the Inclusion of Special Conditions in Neighborhood Stabilization Program Grant Agreements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited HUD’s Office of Block Grant Assistance’s (Office) controls over special conditions in Neighborhood Stabilization Program grant agreements under Title III of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Act) as amended. The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2010 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether HUD’s…
March 28, 2010
Report
#2010-CH-0001
HUD's Office of Community Planning and Development Had Established and Implemented an Appropriate Risk Assessment Process
We reviewed the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Community Planning and Development’s (CPD) risk assessment process. We initiated the review as part of the activities in our fiscal year 2010 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether CPD had established and properly implemented a risk assessment process that used appropriate measures to determine risk and identify grantees for monitoring.
We…
March 17, 2010
Report
#2010-BO-0002
Evaluation of Debt Servicing and Collections, Financial Operations Center, Albany, NY
We evaluated the efforts of HUD’s Financial Operations Center (FOC) in managing Federal Housing Administration (FHA) debts due HUD as a result of single-family indemnification agreements and civil money penalties (CMP). We wanted to know whether FOC debt servicing and collections complied with applicable Federal laws and regulations. We also wanted to determine the status and assess the collectability of the September 30, 2008,…
March 02, 2010
Report
#IED-09-007
Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board Survey of Contracts and Grants Workforce Staffing and Qualifications – Evaluation of Reported Staffing Levels
We evaluated HUD’s September 2009 response to questions posed by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board’s survey of staff resources dedicated to American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA). We wanted to know if the reported number of HUD contract and grant personnel responsible for ARRA funding and oversight could be validated and relied on for public disclosure.
The full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing levels submitted in…
March 02, 2010
Report
#IED-09-006
HUD's Philadelphia, PA, Homeownership Center Did Not Always Ensure That Required Background Investigations Were Completed for Its Contracted Employees
In accordance with our annual audit plan and due to concerns regarding the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) capacity to handle the increasing demand for loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), we initiated an audit of HUD’s Philadelphia, PA, Homeownership Center (Center). This is the first of two audit reports that we plan to issue on the Center’s capacity to process current demand for FHA loans. The…
February 24, 2010
Report
#2010-PH-0001
District of Columbia - HOME Funds Provided to Developer H.R. Crawford for Parkside Terrace Apartments
We completed a review of the District of Columbia’s (grantee) administration of HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds that it provided to CEMI-Parkside Associates, LLP (Parkside Associates), a limited partnership managed by developer H.R. Crawford. The funds were provided for the rehabilitation/construction of a high rise property known as Parkside Terrace Apartments (Parkside Terrace). We initiated the review in response to a…
February 23, 2010
Memorandum
#2010-PH-1802
HUD - Office of Public Housing
We initiated the audit of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) efforts to recover the City of New London, CT, Housing Authority (Authority) due to its longstanding troubled status. The Authority has had significant management deficiencies for more than 10 years, and HUD identified the Authority as “overall troubled” in May of 2004. Our objective for this audit was to evaluate HUD’s effectiveness in identifying and…
February 16, 2010
Report
#2010-BO-0001
HUD Guidance on American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Capital Fund Physical Needs Assessment
We reviewed the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s) guidance on using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) capital funding for physical needs assessments. Our objective was to determine whether HUD’s guidance to grantees on using Recovery Act capital funds for physical needs assessments was sufficient to ensure grantees had the information needed to avoid missing the grant obligation deadline of…
January 13, 2010
Memorandum
#2010-FW-0801
HUD's Regulatory Agreement with the Yorkville Cooperative Does Not Protect HUD's Interest
We performed this review at the request of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Multifamily Program Center, Richmond field office, due to concerns regarding the appropriateness of HUD's current regulatory agreement with the Yorkville Cooperative (Cooperative). Our objective was to determine if HUD entered into the appropriate regulatory agreement with the Cooperative for its Section 221(d)(3) program.
HUD and the…
January 10, 2010
Memorandum
#2010-PH-0801
HUD's Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control Awarded Grants to Ineligible Applicants
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control’s (OHHLHC) selection procedures used to award American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) grants. Our objective was to determine whether OHHLHC awarded (1) Recovery Act funds in accordance with the selection criteria specified in the fiscal year 2008 notices of funding availability (notices) and the Recovery Act…
January 09, 2010
Report
#2010-HA-0001
The City of Grand Prairie, TX, Maintains Capacity to Adequately Administer Recovery Funding But Needs to Make Program Improvements
As part of our organization’s commitment to ensure the proper use of recovery funding, we performed a review of the City of Grand Prairie’s (City) operations to evaluate its capacity to administer the $3.2 million received under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). Specifically, our objective was to review and assess the City’s capacity and risks in the following…
January 04, 2010
Memorandum
#2010-FW-1803