U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Hotline

Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse
26 items
    Clear all
    Date Issued
    Miami-Dade County, Florida, Needs to Strengthen Controls over ItsNeighborhood Stabilization Program
    Miami Dade County, Florida (County) was awarded $62.2 million in Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) funds under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. HUD's Office of Inspector General (OIG) evaluated the County's capacity to administer its NSP funds. The OIG found that the County did not execute agreements between County departments, existing policies and procedures did not address NSP requirements, adequate supporting…
    November 18, 2009
    Memorandum
    #2010-AT-1801
    The City of Miami, Florida, Did Not Properly Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program
    HUD OIG audited the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the City of Miami, Florida (City). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG program in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. The City did not administer its CDBG program in accordance with applicable HUD requirements. It did not comply with HUD requirements in…
    August 17, 2009
    Report
    #2009-AT-1011
    Miami-Dade County, Florida, Did Not Properly Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program
    HUD-OIG audited the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by Miami-Dade County, Florida (County). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the County administered its CDBG program in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. The County did not administer its CDBG program in accordance with applicable HUD requirements. It did not comply with HUD requirements…
    June 18, 2009
    Report
    #2009-AT-1008
    The City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Did Not Properly Administer ItsCommunity Development Block Grant Program
    HUD OIG audited the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida (City). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG program in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. The City did not administer its CDBG program in accordance with applicable HUD requirements. It did not provide supporting…
    January 09, 2008
    Report
    #2008-AT-1005
    The City of West Palm Beach, FL, Did Not Properly Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program
    HUD OIG audited the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the City of West Palm Beach, Florida (City). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG program in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. The City failed to properly administer its CDBG program in accordance with HUD requirements. Specifically, the City was…
    January 07, 2008
    Report
    #2008-AT-1004
    The City of Jacksonville, FL Lacked Proper Support for Some Subrecipients Purchases and Expenditures
    We reviewed the City of Jacksonville/County of Duval, Florida's (City) Community Development Block Grant program (CDBG). We conducted the review as part of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of the Inspector General's annual audit plan. Our objectives were to determine whether the City complied with CDBG regulations and requirements related to (a) use of competition when purchasing goods and services, (b)…
    December 24, 2007
    Report
    #2008-AT-1003