Control Weaknesses at the Syracuse Housing Authority, Syracuse, New York May Affect Its Capacity to Administer American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds
January 12, 2010
Memorandum
#2010-NY-1802
Mortgage Counseling Services, Inc., College Park, Georgia, Did Not Follow HUD Requirements in Originating and Closing Loans and Implementing Its Quality Control Program
HUD OIG performed an audit of Mortgage Counseling Services, Inc., a Federal Housing Administration approved non-supervised lender. The review was performed based on the lender’s high default rates. The purpose of the audit was to determine whether the lender followed the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) requirements for (1) borrower eligibility and creditworthiness and property eligibility when underwriting loans and (…
January 11, 2010
Report
#2010-AT-1001
SFDS Development Corporation, New York, NY had Weaknesses in its Financial, Procurement and Administrative Controls
We audited the SFDS Development Corporation (agent), management agent for three U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) subsidized Section 202 elderly housing direct loan properties, in response to a complaint to
the Office ofInspector General (OlG) Hotline that alleged misappropriation of HUD funds by the agent. The objective of our review was to assess the merits of the complaint. It was expanded to assess the agent's…
December 20, 2009
Report
#2010-NY-1006
The City of Utica, New York, Has the Capacity to Administer Lead-Based Paint Funds Provided Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
December 20, 2009
Memorandum
#2010-NY-1801
The City of Atlanta, GA, Needs To Improve Certain Aspects of Its NSP To Meet the Program’s 18-Month Obligation Deadline
The City of Atlanta (City) received a $12.3 million Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) grant from HUD that was authorized under Title III of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act. Also, the City applied for an additional $57.9 million in NSP funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. We selected the City for review due to the amount of its NSP funding and because of performance concerns identified during our…
December 12, 2009
Memorandum
#2010-AT-1802
The South Bronx Community Management Co., Inc., Bronx, New York, Had Weaknesses in Its Administration of the Project Maria Isabel
We audited the management agent operations of the South Bronx Community Management Co., Inc. (agent), as they relate to the administration of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-Section 202 direct loan for elderly and handicapped housing project Maria Isabel at the request of the HUD New York City Office of Multifamily Housing. The audit disclosed that the agent generally complied with HUD financial and unit maintenance…
November 02, 2009
Report
#2010-NY-1003
The Housing Authority of the City of Conyers, Georgia, Did Not Maintain Adequate Controls over its Federal Funds
HUD OIG performed an audit of the Housing Authority of the City of Conyers' administration of its disbursements and procurement procedures. The Georgia State Office of Public Housing requested the audit due to concerns regarding the use of its funds and violation of its procurement procedures The purpose of the audit was to determine whether the Authority used its federal funds in compliance with HUD regulations and other requirements.
The…
October 19, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1001
The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, New York, New York, Generally Administered CDBG Disaster Recovery Assistance Funds in Accordance with Regulations
We completed the thirteenth report in our ongoing audits of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation’s (the auditee) administration of the $2.783 billion in Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance funds provided to the State of New York in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. The auditee disbursed approximately $50.3 million of these funds during our…
October 05, 2009
Report
#2010-NY-1001
The City of Atlanta Entered Incorrect Commitments into HUD’s Integrated Disbursement and Information System for its HOME Program
We audited the City of Atlanta’s (City) HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) because it has received more than $17 million in HOME funding since 2005. Our objective was to determine whether the City accurately entered commitments into the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Integrated Disbursement and Information System (information system) for HOME-funded activities.
The City did not comply with HUD requirements…
September 27, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1013
HUD Lacked Adequate Controls to Ensure the Timely Commitment and Expenditure of HOME funds
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) as part of our fiscal year 2009 annual audit plan. Our audit objectives were to assess the adequacy of HUD’s monitoring and implementation of requirements to recapture HOME funds not committed within two years and spent within five years, assess the adequacy of HUD’s monitoring and use of its Integrated Disbursement and…
September 27, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-0001
The City of Little Falls, New York, Urban Renewal Agency, Small Cities Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs, Complaint No. HL-09-0090
September 07, 2009
Memorandum
#2009-NY-1801
Significant Flaws Identified at the Lackawanna Municipal Housing Authority May Affects Its Capacity to Administer American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds
We are conducting an audit of the Lackawanna Municipal Housing Authority’s (Authority) administration of its capital fund program. We selected this auditee because the Authority pledged its future capital fund appropriations to perform a special project as part of the Capital Fund Financing Program. Specifically, the Authority incurred a $4.25 million long-term liability to perform lead-based paint abatement and modernization work at 90…
July 23, 2009
Memorandum
#2009-NY-0802
The Housing Authority of the City of Newnan, Georgia, Inappropriately Encumbered Assets and Advanced Funds to Support Its Nonprofit Organization
HUD OIG performed an audit of the Housing Authority of the City of Newnan’s activities with its related nonprofit organization, the Newnan Housing Development Corporation. The review was performed based on concerns that the Authority encumbered its assets, used its federal funds to support nonprofit development activities, and had a conflict-of-interest transaction. The purpose of the audit was to determine whether the Authority…
July 19, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1009
Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, New York, New York, Administered Disaster Recovery Assistance Funds in Accordance with HUD Regulations
We completed the twelfth report in our ongoing audits of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation's (the auditee) administration of the Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance funds provided to the State of New York in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. During our audit period, April 1 through September 30, 2008, the auditee disbursed approximately $…
May 26, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1013
The City of Rome, New York, Did Not Administer Its Economic Development Activity in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the City of Rome, New York's (City), administration of its economic development activity known as General Cable under its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the City (1) administered this economic development activity effectively, efficiently, and economically in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules…
May 19, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1012
North Hempstead Housing Authority, Great Neck, New York, Had Weaknesses in Its Housing Choice Voucher and Family Self-Sufficiency Programs
We audited the North Hempstead Housing Authority's (Authority) administration of its Housing Choice Voucher and Family Self-Sufficiency to determine whether the Authority administered these programs in compliance with HUD regulations. The Authority properly determined Section 8 tenant eligibility and accurately calculated rental subsidies. However, the Authority improperly selected both units and tenants for project-based voucher assistance,…
May 14, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1011
The Jonesboro Housing Authority Generally Complied with Housing Quality Standards Inspections Requirements although Certain Weaknesses Existed
We audited the Jonesboro Housing Authority's (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program as part of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Inspector General's (OIG) annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority's Section 8 housing choice voucher units met HUD standards.
The Authority's Section 8 units generally met housing quality standards. Our inspection of 16 Section 8 units…
April 22, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1006
The City of Augusta, Georgia, Did Not Comply with HOME Monitoring Requirements
HUD OIG performed an audit of the City of Augusta's HOME Investment Partnerships program as part of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's annual audit plan. The purpose of the audit was to determine whether the City complied with HOME program requirements for monitoring (1) HOME community housing development organizations and subrecipients and (2) the use of CHDOs' proceeds. This is the second of two audit reports on the HOME…
March 31, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1005
The City of Yonkers, New York, Had Weaknesses in the Administration of its Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program
March 04, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1009
The City of Newburgh, New York, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the City of Newburgh, New York's administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the City (1) administered its CDBG program effectively, efficiently, and economically in accordance with applicable rules and regulations, and (2) expended CDBG funds for eligible activities that met a national objective of the program.
The audit disclosed that…
February 22, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1008