U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Hotline

Crime, Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
2418 items
    Clear all
    Date Issued
    The Housing Authority of the City of Gary, Indiana, Lacked Adequate Controls over Refunding Savings
    March 22, 2007
    Report
    #2007-CH-1005
    The Office of Community Development, City of Chicopee, Massachusetts, Did Not Properly Award and Administer Community Development Block Grant and HOME Funds Used for its Housing Activities
    As part of our annual plan, we audited the Office of Community Development, City of Chicopee, Massachusetts' (City) administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs. The objective of the audit was to evaluate the City's administration of its housing rehabilitation contracts funded through the CDBG or HOME programs and its oversight and monitoring of various for-profit developers (developers) involved in the…
    March 20, 2007
    Report
    #2007-BO-1003
    The Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara
    March 15, 2007
    Report
    #2007-LA-1006
    The State of Nebraska Did Not Close HOME Projects in a Timely Manner
    March 12, 2007
    Report
    #2007-KC-1005
    Peregrine Health Management Company Used Project Funds for Ineleigible, Unsupported, and/or Unnecessary Costs
    March 11, 2007
    Report
    #2007-NY-1003
    The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Needs to Improve Internal Controls Over Its Program
    March 07, 2007
    Report
    #2007-AT-1004
    Cheyenne Housing Authority in Cheyenne, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
    HUD-OIG reviewed the Cheyenne Housing Authority's (Authority) administration and management contract with Housing Operations and Management, Incorporated (contractor), to determine whether the Authority awarded the contract in accordance with federal procurement requirements. The Authority did not follow federal procurement requirements and its own procurement policy when it awarded its administration and management contract to the contractor.…
    March 03, 2007
    Report
    #2007-DE-1004
    Chapter 5 - Insured Development Cost Certification Audit Guidance
    February 28, 2007
    Single audit guidance
    The Lusk Housing Authority in Lusk, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
    February 25, 2007
    Report
    #2007-DE-1002
    The Buffalo Housing Authority in Buffalo, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
    February 25, 2007
    Report
    #2007-DE-1003
    The Housing Authority of Bexar County, Texas, Overhoused Tenants and Paid Excessive Housing Assistance Payments in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program
    February 20, 2007
    Report
    #2007-FW-1005
    The Newport News Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Newport News, Virginia, Did Not Always Follow HUD Requirements
    February 18, 2007
    Report
    #2007-PH-1005
    Oakland Housing Authority Did Not Comply with Procurement and Contracting Requirements
    February 12, 2007
    Report
    #2007-LA-1005
    The Housing Authority of the City of Evansville, Indiana, Needs to Improve Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Administration
    February 11, 2007
    Report
    #2007-CH-1003
    Gwinnett County, Georgia, Subrecipients Did Not Provide Funds Required by Their Contracts
    January 29, 2007
    Report
    #2007-AT-1003
    Managment Agent Fees Claimed by P.J. Alizio Realty, Inc.
    January 27, 2007
    Memorandum
    #2007-NY-1801
    Benton Harbor Housing Commission, Benton Harbor, Michigan, Did Not Effectively Manage Its Public Housing Program and Has Not Used Special Purpose Grant Funds It Received More Than Nine Years Ago
    January 23, 2007
    Report
    #2007-CH-1002
    The Housing Authority of East St. Louis, IlliNis, Improperly Used Public Housing Funds
    What We Audited and Why  We audited the East St. Louis Housing Authority (Authority) because of a hotline complaint alleging that Authority’s management misused U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds.  Our audit objective was to determine whether the Authority followed HUD’s regulations and its own policies when procuring goods and services, granting leave, and managing vehicle operations. What We Found…
    January 12, 2007
    Report
    #2007-KC-1004
    The Marion Housing Authority, Marion, Indiana, Improperly Used HUD funds for nonprofit Development Activities
    What We Audited and Why We audited the Marion Housing Authority's (Authority) nonprofit development activities. The review of public housing authorities' development activities is set forth in our fiscal year 2006 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority because it was identified as having high-risk indicators of nonprofit development activity. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority diverted or pledged resources subject to…
    December 13, 2006
    Report
    #2007-CH-1001
    Housing Authority of the County of Cook, Chicago, IlliNis, Had Weak Controls over Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program
    What We Audited and Why We audited the Housing Authority of the County of Cook's (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (program). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2005 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority based upon a risk analysis that identified it as having a high-risk program. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority managed its program in accordance with the U.S. Department of…
    September 30, 2006
    Report
    #2006-CH-1021