HUD's Office of the Chief Financial Officer Did Not Comply With the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014
Designate additional HUD personnel and establish an internal reporting structure to complete DATA Act implementation, while sustaining reliable DATA Act reporting for later periods.
HUD's Office of the Chief Financial Officer Did Not Comply With the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014
Validate, certify, and submit all reportable FHA and Ginnie Mae data through the DATA Act broker and report the data on USASpending.gov, including files A through F.
HUD's Office of the Chief Financial Officer Did Not Comply With the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014
Complete data quality and error resolution for HUD’s loan programs to ensure inclusion in HUD’s subsequent submissions.
HUD's Office of the Chief Financial Officer Did Not Comply With the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014
Allocate the financial resources to ensure that reconciliations are performed in the consolidation of source system data to the DATA Act submission files.
HUD's Office of the Chief Financial Officer Did Not Comply With the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014
Establish and implement internal control policies and procedures for consolidating and reconciling data from HUD, Ginnie Mae, and FHA source systems are documented and include a governance structure, including roles, responsibilities, and personnel completing DATA Act reporting procedures.
HUD's Office of Public Housing Did Not Clearly Define or Provide Guidance for Public Housing Agency Certifications
We recommend that the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Housing and Voucher Program follow departmental clearance procedures and issue clarification to public housing agencies to explain what is being certified to in the Application.
HUD Lacked Adequate Oversight of Lead-Based Paint Reporting and
Remediation in Its Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher Programs
Implement adequate procedures and controls at HUD’s field offices to ensure that requirements of 24 CFR Part 35 are followed by public housing agencies, including monitoring the public housing agencies to ensure that required actions are appropriately completed and performed in a timely manner.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Repay from non-Federal sources the $1,451,559 in ineligible funds when the HOME program commitment requirements were not completed as required, the environmental reviews were not properly completed, and funds were not disbursed in accordance with written agreements.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Support that $1,559,908 in HOME funds disbursed was reasonable, supported, and allowable in accordance with Federal requirements or repay from non-Federal funds any amount that cannot be supported.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Support that $1,253,596 in funds not yet expended was reasonable, supported, and allowable or reallocate the funds, thus ensuring that they will be put to their intended use.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Develop and implement adequate underwriting policies and procedures for their affordable housing activities and for the downpayment assistance program to ensure that HOME activities are consistent and meet Federal requirements. Further, they should include the downpayment underwriting policies and procedures in the written agreement with the City’s subrecipient.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Cancel activities in IDIS that have had no construction in more than 12 months.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Develop and implement adequate environmental policies and procedures to ensure that HOME activities are properly classified, the environmental review is documented and supported, and that HUD and Federal environmental requirements have been followed before committing HOME funds to an activity
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Determine the total supported development costs for the completed HOME activities and calculate and obtain any program income due to the HOME program.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Support that City officials properly administered the HOME program and earned $338,665 in HOME administrative fees or repay from non-Federal funds any amount that cannot be supported.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Develop and implement tools to improve record-keeping practices to support the eligibility, necessity, and reasonableness of the HOME activities.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Request that HUD headquarters recalculate the City’s commitment shortfall for program year 2013 based on the lack of the amendment with the City’s subrecipient and for the projects that were not properly committed.
The City of Providence, RI, Did Not Properly Administer Its HOME Program
Provide technical assistance to the City to ensure that City officials responsible for administering the HOME program receive necessary HOME program training.
CPD's Risk Assessment and Monitoring Program Did Not Provide Effective Oversight of Federal Funds
We recommend that the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Operations develop and implement policies to require CPD headquarters’ substantive involvement and responsibility in the risk assessment and monitoring function, including (1) oversight of risk assessment, including ensuring that all required grantees have a risk assessment performed; (2) review of annual work plans; (3) evaluation of monitoring performance and findings; (4) institution of…
CPD's Risk Assessment and Monitoring Program Did Not Provide Effective Oversight of Federal Funds
We recommend that the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Operations establish a monitoring tracking system, organized on a CPD field office basis, to incorporate and track internal and external data and provide an immediate, multiyear quantification of grantees, grants, and dollar value for both monitored and not monitored grantees, allowing immediate assessment of monitoring findings, resolutions, and coverage individually and in total.