Require MidFirst to remedy the 24 borrowers in our sample with improper foreclosure filings or take administrative actions if appropriate.

Analyze MidFirst’s resolution of the manual process issues identified during its 2022 quality control review to verify that it remedied the borrowers or HUD and corrected the issues identified related to manual processing.

Require MidFirst to update its policies and procedures to comply with HUD requirements by placing foreclosure holds for loss mitigation requests made before the first legal filing.

Update guidance to clarify the different roles and responsibilities of the ALU, CO, CS, and COR.

Develop ALU engagement standards and incorporate them into acquisition policies and procedures.

We recommend that the Chief Procurement Officer develop, implement, and communicate requirements for program offices to establish written minimum roles and responsibilities for their respective procurement management functions, including but not limited to CORs, PMs, and SMEs.

Require Carrington to remedy HUD and the 27 borrowers in our sample with improper foreclosure filings and take administrative actions if appropriate.

Require Carrington to perform a review of loans affected by the system errors and when appropriate, remedy the borrowers or HUD.

Require Carrington to update its policies and procedures to comply with HUD requirements by reviewing eligible borrowers for streamlined options without unnecessary documents, notifying borrowers if they are ineligible for any loss mitigation options, and using best efforts to review borrowers for loss mitigation within 37 days of the foreclosure sale date.

Require Carrington to implement improved controls to prevent manual errors by performing additional review of all foreclosure actions and performing timely review of all documentation provided by the borrowers and third parties.

We recommend that HUD work with Connecticut and Shelby County to fully realize the program benefits by (1) assessing whether any of the current project activities need to be replaced with more viable project activities, thereby ensuring that any modifications to the project activities will lessen the susceptibility of rain and flood events; (2) assessing whether administrative funds have been properly allocated and charged to identify any…

We recommend that HUD conduct onsite or remote monitoring for the City of Minot and Tennessee, which have not had any monitoring since grant inception, to ensure that these grantees are on track to meet their program goals.

We recommend that HUD for grantees with delayed project activities (California, Connecticut, Louisiana, Tennessee, Virginia, New York City, Minot, and Shelby County), require each grantee to provide a detailed timeline with milestone dates of when projects should be completed and provide updates to ensure that grantees stay on schedule.

We recommend that HUD for its disaster-related program wide activities, revise the action plan and quarterly performance review checklists to a format that more specifically and directly addresses the subject program.

We recommend that HUD for its disaster-related program wide activities, require grantees to provide documentation showing that they have upfront collaboration with partnering entities in executing the grant program. If the grantee plans to hire contractors, HUD should ensure that grantees have a plan to quickly onboard contractors early in the program.

Provide evidence to support that the Authority corrected the 11 unit deficiencies for the 5 units and 7 building deficiencies for 4 buildings with outstanding deficiencies.

Determine the frequency of its quality control reviews of its inspections and work orders and update its quality control policy, training materials, and other resources as appropriate to ensure that its quality control process is consistently implemented.

Support that it has implemented its quality control policy for (1) monitoring the effectiveness of its unit and building inspections to ensure compliance with HUD’s and its own requirements and (2) reviewing work orders to ensure that cited deficiencies are corrected in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements.

Provide evidence to support that the Authority corrected the four non-life-threatening deficiencies for the three units with outstanding deficiencies.

Implement adequate procedures and controls to ensure that the deficiencies identified during annual self-inspections are properly categorized and corrected in a timely manner.