Develop and implement written policies and procedures for specific departments, update and implement CDBG-specific written policies and procedures, and provide formal training and technical assistance to the Development and Resource Management Department employees to ensure that they understand and follow CDBG requirements.
2017-LA-1006 | Agosto 08, 2017
The City of Fresno, CA, Did Not Administer Its Community Development Block Grant in Accordance With HUD Requirements
Community Planning and Development
- Status2017-LA-1006-001-KOpenClosedClosed on Agosto 02, 2018
- Status2017-LA-1006-001-LOpenClosedClosed on Agosto 02, 2018
Develop and implement a monitoring program within the City’s Development and Resource Management Department to ensure that it periodically monitors and provides guidance to its subrecipient(s) and City departments on how to administer CDBG funds.
2017-AT-1010 | Agosto 03, 2017
The Louisville Metro Housing Authority, Louisville, KY, Did Not Comply With HUD’s and Its Own Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Requirements
Public and Indian Housing
- Status2017-AT-1010-001-AOpenClosed$70,992Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Closed on Marzo 15, 2019Reimburse the program $70,992 ($63,312 $7,680) from non-Federal funds for housing assistance payments made and administrative fees received for the units that materially failed to meet HUD’s housing quality standards.
- Status2017-AT-1010-001-BOpenClosedClosed on Marzo 15, 2019
Certify, along with the owners of the 103 units cited in the finding, that the applicable housing quality standards violations have been corrected.
- Status2017-AT-1010-001-COpenClosedClosed on Marzo 27, 2019
Develop and implement adequate policies and procedures for conducting quality control inspections in accordance with HUD’s requirements.
- Status2017-AT-1010-001-DOpenClosed$20,566,345Funds Put to Better Use
Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Closed on Marzo 15, 2019Develop and implement adequate procedures and controls to ensure that its quality control inspection program functions properly to include adequately monitoring the inspection contractor to prevent $20,566,345 in program funds from being spent over the next year on units that do not materially comply with requirements.
- Status2017-AT-1010-002-AOpenClosed$2,492Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Closed on Marzo 15, 2019Reimburse the program $2,492 ($2,286 in housing assistance payments and $206 in administrative fees received) from non-Federal funds for rental subsidies not abated on four units.
- Status2017-AT-1010-002-BOpenClosedClosed on Agosto 06, 2019
Complete a review of rental subsidy abatements for all current units for which a retroactive abatement was not conducted. The Authority should reimburse the program from non-Federal funds for any overpaid rental subsidy.
- Status2017-AT-1010-002-COpenClosedClosed on Marzo 15, 2019
Develop and implement written procedures and a process for retroactively abating housing assistance payments.
- Status2017-AT-1010-002-DOpenClosedClosed on Marzo 25, 2019
Complete a rent reasonableness determination for all current units for which a determination was required but not completed. The Authority should reimburse the program from non-Federal funds for any overpaid rental subsidy.
- Status2017-AT-1010-002-EOpenClosedClosed on Marzo 27, 2019
Develop and implement written procedures to ensure that a rent reasonableness determination is performed before rent increases are approved.
- Status2017-AT-1010-002-FOpenClosedClosed on Octubre 31, 2018
Complete a review that owners of current assisted units are not debarred, suspended, or subject to a limited denial of participation.
- Status2017-AT-1010-002-GOpenClosedClosed on Marzo 15, 2019
Develop and implement written procedures for conducting a complete owner eligibility determination.
- Status2017-AT-1010-002-HOpenClosedClosed on Marzo 27, 2019
Provide adequate training to its staff to ensure compliance with HUD’s requirements for program units.
2017-AT-1008 | Julio 20, 2017
The City of Birmingham, AL, Did Not Ensure That Adequate Policies and Procedures Were Implemented for Its Internal Audits and Procurement Process
Community Planning and Development
- Status2017-AT-1008-001-AOpenClosedClosed on Noviembre 02, 2017
Develop and implement HUD-approved policies and procedures to ensure that the process for conducting an internal audit complies with HUD regulations and the policies and procedures are submitted and certified to HUD.
- Status2017-AT-1008-001-BOpenClosedClosed on Noviembre 02, 2017
Immediately conduct an internal audit of the CDBG-DR grant funds.
- Status2017-AT-1008-001-COpenClosedClosed on Noviembre 02, 2017
Update, finalize, and implement its procurement policies to comply with 2 CFR 200.317-326.
2017-AT-1009 | Julio 20, 2017
Louisville Metro, Louisville, KY, Did Not Always Administer Its HOPWA Program in Accordance With HUD’s and Its Own Requirements
Community Planning and Development
- Status2017-AT-1009-001-AOpenClosed$31,157Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Closed on Julio 11, 2018Adequately support or reimburse its HOPWA program $31,157 from non-Federal funds for the inappropriate disbursements.
- Status2017-AT-1009-001-BOpenClosed$14,017Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Closed on Julio 11, 2018Reimburse its HOPWA program $14,017 from non-Federal funds for the inappropriate disbursements.
- Status2017-AT-1009-001-COpenClosedClosed on Noviembre 15, 2017
Provide adequate training to staff responsible for reviewing and approving the expenditures to ensure compliance with HUD’s and Louisville Metro’s requirements for the administration of the HOPWA program, including processing program disbursements and monitoring project sponsors’ cash management.