Review the reserve for replacement accounts for the 14 project owners that did not make annual adjustments for inflation, as identified in the capital needs assessment, to determine whether the account balances are sufficient to meet anticipated capital needs. If the account balances are not sufficient, HUD should require the owners to appropriately fund the accounts.
2025-CH-0002 | June 26, 2025
HUD's Office of Public and Indian Housing Needs to Improve Its Oversight of Non-FHA-Insured PBV Projects Converted Under RAD
Public and Indian Housing
- Status2025-CH-0002-001-FOpenClosed
- Status2025-CH-0002-001-GOpenClosed
Implement a plan to review the reserve for replacement accounts for all RAD PBV projects to ensure that reserve for replacement accounts are appropriately funded.
- Status2025-CH-0002-001-HOpenClosed$1,005,913Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Obtain documentation from the PHAs to support that more than $1 million in withdrawals from the eight reserve accounts complied with HUD’s requirements or require the project owners to reimburse the reserve accounts for the unsupported withdrawals.
- Status2025-CH-0002-001-JOpenClosed
Collect data on projects’ reserve for replacement accounts to support the Office of Field Operations’ monitoring activities.
2025-NY-1003 | June 20, 2025
Flat Branch Mortgage, Inc. Did Not Have a Sufficient Quality Control Program for FHA-Insured Loans
Housing
- Status2025-NY-1003-001-AOpenClosed
Update its QC plan and related processes and procedures to align with requirements for loan selection, including maintaining data and documenting how sample sizes and loan selections were determined.
- Status2025-NY-1003-001-BOpenClosed
Update its QC plan and related processes and procedures to align with requirements for (1) loan file reviews, including requirements to obtain new credit reports, reverify borrower information, and obtain appraisal field reviews; (2) documenting review results, including maintaining data on findings; (3) assessment of findings; (4) mitigation of findings; (5) reporting findings internally to lender management; and (6) reporting findings to HUD when required.
- Status2025-NY-1003-001-COpenClosed
Provide annual training to its staff and management on HUD requirements for lender QC programs and provide proof of training to HUD.
- Status2025-NY-1003-001-DOpenClosed
Review the six EPD loans not previously selected for review and submit the results to HUD, including all findings of fraud or material misrepresentation, along with any other material findings that it is unable to mitigate. If required, Flat Branch should execute indemnification agreements or reimburse claims paid to help protect the FHA insurance fund from unacceptable risk.
- Status2025-NY-1003-001-EOpenClosed
Obtain credit reports and reverify borrower information for up to 279 EPD reviews performed and evaluate the risk of both new findings identified and existing findings contained in its QC files to confirm whether it self-reported to HUD all findings of fraud or material misrepresentation, along with any other material findings that its records did not show have been acceptably mitigated. If required, Flat Branch should execute indemnification agreements or reimburse claims paid to help protect the FHA insurance fund from unacceptable risk.
- Status2025-NY-1003-001-FOpenClosed
Evaluate its QC files for the 29 post-closing QC reviews in which it identified material findings to confirm whether it self-reported to HUD all findings of fraud or material misrepresentation, along with any other material findings that its records did not show have been acceptably mitigated. If required, Flat Branch should execute indemnification agreements or reimburse claims paid to help protect the FHA insurance fund from unacceptable risk.
- Status2025-NY-1003-001-GOpenClosed$228,793Funds Put to Better Use
Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Provide indemnification agreements or documentation to support the two loans in which it missed material deficiencies and the three loans in which it identified material findings that it did not acceptably mitigate or self-report to HUD. Implementation of this recommendation will protect the FHA insurance fund from an estimated loss of $228,793.
2025-OE-0801 | May 30, 2025
HUD Should Better Track Elevated Blood Lead Levels in HUD-Assisted Multifamily Properties
Housing
- Status2025-OE-0801-1AOpenClosed
Develop and implement a policy that clearly defines roles and responsibilities for Office of Multifamily Housing Programs’ staff for EBLL-related requirements, including the oversight of property owners’ compliance with these requirements.
- Status2025-OE-0801-1BOpenClosed
Establish processes to track reported EBLLs for the Office of Multifamily Housing Programs to easily identify the status of owners’ remediation efforts for units that were the source of the confirmed EBLL.
2025-KC-0002 | May 27, 2025
HUD’s Office of Single Family Housing Did Not Consistently Monitor Its Field Service Management Contractors’ Property Preservation and Protection Services
Housing
- Status2025-KC-0002-001-AOpenClosed
Develop and implement uniform procedures for the FSM desk monitoring review, including a second level review for the FSM monitoring reviews and process for each inspection type.
- Status2025-KC-0002-001-BOpenClosed
Update the FSM monitoring plan and FSM qualitative monitoring database to: (a) clearly define the monitoring questions, (b) include a section for Q7 New Not Ready to Show (NRTS) properties, (c) define which routine inspection reports will be reviewed to conduct the routine inspection monitoring reviews and (d) develop a monitoring question to evaluate photo date stamps.
- Status2025-KC-0002-001-COpenClosed
Ensure that program officials periodically provide all FSM CORs and staff involved in the monitoring process uniform property inspection training.
2025-FO-0006 | May 13, 2025
HUD Did Not Comply With the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019
Chief Financial Officer
- Status2025-FO-0006-002-AOpenClosedPriorityPriority
We believe these open recommendations, if implemented, will have the greatest impact on helping HUD achieve its mission to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality affordable homes for all.
Update HUD Handbook 1900.40, Do Not Pay policy, to clearly define the responsibilities for all parties and align it with current laws, processes, and procedures. This should include defining responsibilities for preaward and prepayment verification, and developing a process and governance structure to ensure that preaward and prepayment verification are consistently performed across HUD’s programs.
Status
As of January 2026, HUD has not provided a management decision for this recommendation. While HUD reestablished its computer matching agreement with the Department of Treasury through the Treasury Do Not Pay verification portal, HUD has not developed a policy to define responsibilities going forward.
HUD OIG recently initiated the annual Payment Integrity Information Act (PIIA) audit for fiscal year 2025. During this audit we will work with HUD to determine the status of this recommendation.
Analysis
Updating the HUD Handbook 1900.40 will define responsible parties for ensuring compliance with the Do Not Pay Initiative (DNP).
The implementation of this recommendation will result in consistent use of DNP, allowing for instant verification of eligibility across the billions in payments that HUD processes, resulting in the reduction of future improper payments. - Status2025-FO-0006-002-BOpenClosed
Develop a standard operating procedure to ensure that the OCFO is 1) monitoring the DNP Computer Matching agreement to ensure continuity, 2) reporting accurately on its DNP matching, and 3) working with program offices to adjudicate any payments that are identified as potentially improper during the computer matching process.
- Status2025-FO-0006-002-COpenClosed$212,208,450Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Work with Multifamily Housing to investigate the 11 of 24 entities with expired SAM.gov registrations to determine if those entities should have received payments totaling $212,208,450 and perform the required follow-up actions once a determination is made.
2025-FO-0802 | March 31, 2025
HUD Open Obligations Review Results
Office of Administration
- Status2025-FO-0802-001-AOpenClosed$38,525,837Funds Put to Better Use
Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Deobligate the 835 administrative obligations totaling $38,525,836.88 identified for deobligation during the fiscal year 2024 OOR that had not been deobligated as of February 28, 2025.