U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.


We audited the New Brunswick Housing Authority because it was classified as a troubled public housing agency and based on our risk analysis of public housing agencies located in the State of New Jersey.  The objective of the audit was to determine whether the Authority administered its operating and capital funds in accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements.

We found that the Authority did not always administer its operating and capital funds in accordance with HUD requirements.  Specifically, it (1) did not properly procure goods and services totaling more than $1 million; (2) did not support more than $187,000 in capital fund obligations; (3) did not meet obligation deadlines for more than $704,000 in replacement housing factor funds and disbursed more than $139,000 after the expenditure deadline; (4) charged its project more than $87,000 in excessive management fees; and (5) did not ensure that its budget, financial reports, and accounting data were accurate and up to date.  This condition occurred because the Authority did not fully understand HUD’s requirements and did not have adequate controls to ensure compliance with all requirements.  As a result, HUD did not have assurance that the prices paid for capital improvements and professional services were reasonable, capital funds were used for eligible activities in a timely manner, operating funds were available for the operations of the Authority’s project, and it had accurate information for evaluating the Authority. 

We recommend that HUD require the Authority to (1) provide documentation to show that more than $1 million paid for goods and services was reasonable; (2) provide procurement training to its staff; (3) provide documentation to support more than $187,000 in 2013 and 2014 capital fund obligations; (4) reimburse HUD $139,423 in replacement housing factor funds disbursed after the expenditure deadline; (5) improve its controls to ensure that funds are obligated and spent in a timely manner; (6) reimburse its project more than $87,000 for excessive management fees; (7) submit a request to revise its budget to reflect expenditures; and (8) improve its controls to ensure that its budget, financial reports, and accounting data are accurate and up to date.  Further, we recommend that HUD reduce the Authority’s future capital funds as a penalty for obligating its replacement housing factor funds after the deadline.