U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

The Economic Development Corporation, Newark, New Jersey, Did Not Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements

We completed an audit of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the Economic Development Corporation (Corporation), a subgrantee of Essex County Consortium (the County). Our audit objectives were to determine whether the Corporation adequately administered its CDBG program in accordance with applicable rules and regulations.

The County of Essex, Verona, New Jersey, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Block Grant Program in Accordance With HUD Requirements

We completed an audit of the County of Essex's (County) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, which was administered by its Division of Housing and Community Development. Our audit objectives were to determine whether the County disbursed CDBG funds efficiently and effectively in accordance with its submission to HUD and applicable rules and regulations and had a financial management system in place to adequately safeguard the funds. The County did not always follow applicable regulations and its submission to HUD while disbursing CDBG funds.

The Township of South Orange Village, New Jersey, Did Not Always Disburse Community Development Block Grant Funds As Per HUD Requirements

We completed an audit the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administrated by the Township of South Orange Village (Township), a subgrantee of the Essex County Consortium (County). Our audit objectives were to determine whether the Township disbursed CDBG funds efficiently and effectively in accordance with its submission to the U.S.

New Phoenix Assistance Center, Chicago, Illinois, Failed to Manage Its Supportive Housing Program Grants

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited the New Phoenix Assistance Center's (Center) Supportive Housing Program (Program) grants. The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2007 annual audit plan. We selected the Center based upon HUD's Office of Community Planning and Development being a priority audit area for our office and a request from HUD's Chicago Office of Community Planning and Development.

The State of Colorado Did Not Comply with Community Development Block Grant Program Requirements

We audited the State of Colorado (State), Division of Housing's (Division) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to determine whether the Division (1) awarded CDBG funds to ineligible projects and (2) properly identified and reported program income data. The Division used CDBG funds for ineligible and questionable projects. This condition occurred because management's main focus was on selecting projects that were for the greater good of the state, even if some projects did not fully comply with the U.S.

The City of San Diego, California Did Not Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements When Funding the City's Redevelopment Agency Projects

We audited the City of San Diego's (City) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program in response to a hotline complaint alleging that the City and its Redevelopment Agency (Agency) were violating U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules and regulations. Our main objective was to address the citizen complaint and determine whether the City administered CDBG loans issued to the Agency in accordance with HUD rules and regulations. We found that the City failed to properly administer CDBG funds provided to the Agency in accordance with HUD requirements.

Evaluation of the Front-End Risk Assessment for the Community Development Block Grant Recovery Program

The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General evaluated the front-end risk assessment for the Community Development Block Grant Recovery (CDBG-R) grant. Our objective was to determine whether the assessment complied with the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) updated guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), as well as HUD’s streamlined assessment process.

HUD’s Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System Can Collect the Basic Information Needed to Monitor the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (Amended Report)

As part of the our plan to review the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (program), we reviewed whether the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting system (DRGR) can collect program data at the level of detail necessary to adequately monitor the program. We limited the review to the program established by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. However, HUD will also use DRGR for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Evaluation of the Front-End Risk Assessment for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Inspector General reviewed the front-end risk assessment (assessment) for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 (NSP2). Our objective was to determine whether the assessment complied with the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) updated guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), as well as HUD’s streamlined assessment process.

The Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Baltimore, Maryland, CPD Offices Did Not Adequately Document Their Monitoring of CDBG Program Grantees

We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) monitoring of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program grantees under the jurisdiction of the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Baltimore, Maryland, Community Planning and Development (CPD) field offices as part of our annual audit plan. The audit objective was to determine whether those offices adequately monitored their CDBG program grantees to ensure that they used their grant funds to assist low- and moderate-income families through eligible activities according to HUD requirements.