Weaknesses in the New Core Project Were Not Adequately Addressed
We audited the U.S.
Featured filter
Yes
HUD Did Not Comply With IPERA Due to Significant Deficiencies in Its Reporting and Risk Assessment Processes
We audited the U.S.
Memorandum Report on HUD’s Processes used to Report Information Technology Investments on IT Dashboard
The Office of Evaluation performed preliminary research of the HUD Office of the Chief Information Officer’s (OCIO) management of the agency’s reporting of financial and project information on the Federal IT Dashboard (Dashboard). The objective of the evaluation was to determine if OCIO processes ensured accurate IT investment information was reported on the Dashboard. We found that project managers did not consistently follow processes when they reported IT financial Information for the Dashboard. Of 38 points of contact who received our request to complete a
Independent Auditor’s Report on HUD’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Reports on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting and Compliance with Laws and Regulations
In accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, as amended, we are required to annually audit the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the stand alone financial statements of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Government National Mortgage Administration (Ginnie Mae). Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of the financial statements in accordance with U.S.
Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) Fiscal Year 2013 Evaluation Report
The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (FISMA) directs the Office of Inspector General (OIG) to conduct an annual evaluation of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) information security program. FISMA, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) establish information technology (IT) security guidance and standards for Federal agencies.
HUD Privacy Program Evaluation Report
Federal organizations have a fundamental responsibility to protect the privacy of individuals and their personally identifiable information (PII) that is collected, used, maintained, shared, and disposed of by agency programs and information systems. The management of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs demands the availability and use of extensive amounts of financial, demographic, and personal information. HUD is entrusted with the PII of millions of individuals.
Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) Fiscal Year 2014 Evaluation Report
The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (FISMA) directs the Office of Inspector General (OIG) to conduct an annual evaluation of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) information security program. FISMA, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) establish information technology (IT) security guidance and standards for Federal agencies.
Interim Report on HUD’s Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
We are required to audit the consolidated financial statements of the U.S.
The HUD Office of the Chief Financial Officer Had Not Always Implemented Its User Fee Policy
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development – Office of Inspector General audited HUD’s fiscal year 2013 compliance with the user fee requirements in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-25 and the Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act of 1990. We initiated the audit based on observations in our audit of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) annual lender renewal process (Audit Report No.