The Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration Has Not Adequately Managed Lead-Based Paint in Its Public Housing
Implement an ongoing maintenance program for lead-based paint to ensure unabated and “lead-safe” units remain hazard free.
An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know
Implement an ongoing maintenance program for lead-based paint to ensure unabated and “lead-safe” units remain hazard free.
Abate or implement interim control measures to reduce the risk of exposure to lead-based paint hazards identified through risk assessments.
Conduct lead-based paint inspections at public housing abated through removal methods where an abatement report is unavailable to ensure that units are “lead-free.”
We audited the Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration’s management of lead‐based paint in its public housing program based on our assessment of the risks of lead‐based paint in public housing. The risk factors assessed included the age of buildings, the number of units, and reported cases of childhood lead poisoning. The Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration (Authority) is the second largest public housing agency (PHA) in the country with about 53,700 public housing units, the majority of which were constructed before 1978, the oldest having been
HUD OIG is conducting an evaluation of housing conditions at a Michigan based Public Housing Authority (PHA). All units in HUD-assisted housing are subject to meet quality standards for decent, safe, and sanitary housing. Our evaluation objective is to determine whether a Michigan based PHA provided decent, safe, and sanitary housing at its developments.
Beginning in 2021, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General (OIG), conducted several audits to assess HUD’s anti-fraud efforts and to develop inventories of fraud risks in HUD programs.
HUD OIG is auditing a public housing agency located in Illinois. The housing authority owns and manages public housing units and administers a housing choice voucher program. Our objective is to (1) determine whether the Authority complied with HUD’s and its own requirements for verifying eligibility of individuals for HUD assisted housing based on criminal activity, citizenship, and immigration status, and (2) assess the Authority’s practices for preventing and addressing criminal activity.
HUD OIG is auditing a public housing agency located in California. The housing authority owns and manages public housing units and administers a housing choice voucher program. Our objective is to (1) determine whether the Authority complied with HUD’s and its own requirements for verifying eligibility of individuals for HUD assisted housing based on criminal activity, citizenship, and immigration status, and (2) assess the Authority’s practices for preventing and addressing criminal activity.
HUD OIG is auditing a public housing agency located in the District of Columbia. The housing authority owns and manages public housing units and administers a housing choice voucher program. Our objective is to (1) determine whether the Authority complied with HUD’s and its own requirements for verifying eligibility of individuals for HUD assisted housing based on criminal activity, citizenship, and immigration status, and (2) assess the Authority’s practices for preventing and addressing criminal activity.
We recommend that the Director, Office of Public Housing, New York, instruct the Authority to reimburse from non-Federal funds the $219,715 expended for ineligible costs as follows; $215,402 to HUD, and $4,313 to the 2007 ROSS Family grant.